2000 Honda FCX vs. 2005 Rover 75
To start off, 2005 Rover 75 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Honda FCX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Honda FCX would be higher. At 2,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Rover 75 (175 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 2000 Honda FCX. (122 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 2000 Honda FCX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Rover 75 weights approximately 695 kg more than 2000 Honda FCX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Honda FCX (273 Nm) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Rover 75. (240 Nm). This means 2000 Honda FCX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Honda FCX | 2005 Rover 75 | |
| Make | Honda | Rover |
| Model | FCX | 75 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 999 cc | 2496 cc |
| Engine Type | electric | V |
| Horse Power | 122 HP | 175 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 273 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 1535 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2750 mm |
