2000 Honda FCX vs. 2008 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2008 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Honda FCX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Honda FCX would be higher. At 2,486 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 554 kg more than 2000 Honda FCX.
Because 2008 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Honda FCX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Honda FCX (273 Nm) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Nissan X-Trail. (245 Nm). This means 2000 Honda FCX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Nissan X-Trail. 2000 Honda FCX has automatic transmission and 2008 Nissan X-Trail has manual transmission. 2008 Nissan X-Trail will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Honda FCX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Honda FCX | 2008 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Honda | Nissan |
Model | FCX | X-Trail |
Year Released | 2000 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 999 cc | 2486 cc |
Engine Type | electric | in-line |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 273 Nm | 245 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 1394 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2630 mm |