2000 Honda FCX vs. 2009 Mazda 3
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Honda FCX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Honda FCX would be higher. At 1,598 cc, 2009 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Honda FCX (122 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 3. (104 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Honda FCX should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 288 kg more than 2000 Honda FCX.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Honda FCX (273 Nm) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 3. (145 Nm). This means 2000 Honda FCX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 3. 2000 Honda FCX has automatic transmission and 2009 Mazda 3 has manual transmission. 2009 Mazda 3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Honda FCX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Honda FCX | 2009 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Honda | Mazda |
| Model | FCX | 3 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 999 cc | 1598 cc |
| Horse Power | 122 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 273 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 1128 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2650 mm |
