2000 Honda FCX vs. 2009 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Honda FCX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Honda FCX would be higher. At 3,725 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 151 more horse power than 2000 Honda FCX. (122 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 2000 Honda FCX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 489 kg more than 2000 Honda FCX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Mazda CX-9 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Honda FCX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Honda FCX. (273 Nm). This means 2009 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Honda FCX.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Honda FCX | 2009 Mazda CX-9 | |
| Make | Honda | Mazda |
| Model | FCX | CX-9 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 999 cc | 3725 cc |
| Engine Type | electric | V |
| Horse Power | 122 HP | 273 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 273 Nm | 366 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 1329 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2880 mm |
