2000 Honda FCX vs. 2010 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Honda FCX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Honda FCX would be higher. At 2,179 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser (154 HP) has 32 more horse power than 2000 Honda FCX. (122 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 2000 Honda FCX.
Because 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Honda FCX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser (380 Nm) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Honda FCX. (273 Nm). This means 2010 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Honda FCX. 2000 Honda FCX has automatic transmission and 2010 Citroen C-Crosser has manual transmission. 2010 Citroen C-Crosser will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Honda FCX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Honda FCX | 2010 Citroen C-Crosser | |
Make | Honda | Citroen |
Model | FCX | C-Crosser |
Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 999 cc | 2179 cc |
Engine Type | electric | in-line |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 154 HP |
Torque | 273 Nm | 380 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |