2000 Honda FCX vs. 2010 Dodge Challenger

To start off, 2010 Dodge Challenger is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Honda FCX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Honda FCX would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Dodge Challenger (372 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 250 more horse power than 2000 Honda FCX. (122 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 2000 Honda FCX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 993 kg more than 2000 Honda FCX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2010 Dodge Challenger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Dodge Challenger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Honda FCX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Dodge Challenger (542 Nm) has 269 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Honda FCX. (273 Nm). This means 2010 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Honda FCX.

Compare all specifications: