2000 Honda FCX vs. 2010 Mazda 5
To start off, 2010 Mazda 5 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Honda FCX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Honda FCX would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 5 (153 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 2000 Honda FCX. (122 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 5 should accelerate faster than 2000 Honda FCX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda 5 weights approximately 738 kg more than 2000 Honda FCX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Honda FCX (273 Nm) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Mazda 5. (200 Nm). This means 2000 Honda FCX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Mazda 5.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Honda FCX | 2010 Mazda 5 | |
Make | Honda | Mazda |
Model | FCX | 5 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 999 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Type | electric | in-line |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 273 Nm | 200 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 1578 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2751 mm |