2000 Honda FCX vs. 2011 Land Rover LR4
To start off, 2011 Land Rover LR4 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Honda FCX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Honda FCX would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Land Rover LR4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Land Rover LR4 (375 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 253 more horse power than 2000 Honda FCX. (122 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Land Rover LR4 should accelerate faster than 2000 Honda FCX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Land Rover LR4 weights approximately 1708 kg more than 2000 Honda FCX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2011 Land Rover LR4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Honda FCX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Land Rover LR4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Land Rover LR4 (508 Nm) has 235 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Honda FCX. (273 Nm). This means 2011 Land Rover LR4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Honda FCX.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Honda FCX | 2011 Land Rover LR4 | |
| Make | Honda | Land Rover |
| Model | FCX | LR4 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 999 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Type | electric | V |
| Horse Power | 122 HP | 375 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 273 Nm | 508 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 2548 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2885 mm |
