2000 Honda FCX vs. 2011 Nissan Titan
To start off, 2011 Nissan Titan is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Honda FCX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Honda FCX would be higher. At 5,549 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Nissan Titan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan Titan (317 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 195 more horse power than 2000 Honda FCX. (122 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Titan should accelerate faster than 2000 Honda FCX.
Because 2011 Nissan Titan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Nissan Titan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Honda FCX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Nissan Titan (522 Nm) has 249 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Honda FCX. (273 Nm). This means 2011 Nissan Titan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Honda FCX.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Honda FCX | 2011 Nissan Titan | |
| Make | Honda | Nissan |
| Model | FCX | Titan |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 999 cc | 5549 cc |
| Engine Type | electric | V |
| Horse Power | 122 HP | 317 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 273 Nm | 522 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 6 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3560 mm |
