2000 Honda FCX vs. 2012 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2012 Jaguar XF is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Honda FCX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Honda FCX would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jaguar XF (271 HP) has 149 more horse power than 2000 Honda FCX. (122 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 2000 Honda FCX.
Because 2012 Jaguar XF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Jaguar XF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Honda FCX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jaguar XF (600 Nm) has 327 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Honda FCX. (273 Nm). This means 2012 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Honda FCX.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Honda FCX | 2012 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Honda | Jaguar |
| Model | FCX | XF |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 999 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Type | electric | V |
| Horse Power | 122 HP | 271 HP |
| Torque | 273 Nm | 600 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2908 mm |
