2000 Honda FCX vs. 2013 Chevrolet Tahoe
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Honda FCX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Honda FCX would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Tahoe (316 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 194 more horse power than 2000 Honda FCX. (122 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Tahoe should accelerate faster than 2000 Honda FCX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Tahoe weights approximately 1685 kg more than 2000 Honda FCX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Chevrolet Tahoe is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Honda FCX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Tahoe will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Chevrolet Tahoe (454 Nm) has 181 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Honda FCX. (273 Nm). This means 2013 Chevrolet Tahoe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Honda FCX.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Honda FCX | 2013 Chevrolet Tahoe | |
Make | Honda | Chevrolet |
Model | FCX | Tahoe |
Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 999 cc | 5300 cc |
Engine Type | electric | V |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 316 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 273 Nm | 454 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 2525 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2946 mm |