2000 Honda FCX vs. 2013 Ford Taurus
To start off, 2013 Ford Taurus is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Honda FCX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Honda FCX would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford Taurus (284 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 162 more horse power than 2000 Honda FCX. (122 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 2000 Honda FCX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford Taurus weights approximately 1067 kg more than 2000 Honda FCX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Ford Taurus is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Honda FCX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Ford Taurus will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford Taurus (344 Nm) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Honda FCX. (273 Nm). This means 2013 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Honda FCX.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Honda FCX | 2013 Ford Taurus | |
| Make | Honda | Ford |
| Model | FCX | Taurus |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 999 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Type | electric | V |
| Horse Power | 122 HP | 284 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 273 Nm | 344 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 1907 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2868 mm |
