2000 Honda FCX vs. 2013 Toyota Tundra

To start off, 2013 Toyota Tundra is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Honda FCX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Honda FCX would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Tundra (376 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 254 more horse power than 2000 Honda FCX. (122 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 2000 Honda FCX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 1590 kg more than 2000 Honda FCX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2013 Toyota Tundra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Toyota Tundra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Honda FCX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Toyota Tundra (544 Nm) has 271 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Honda FCX. (273 Nm). This means 2013 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Honda FCX.

Compare all specifications: