2000 Honda HR-V vs. 1977 Volvo 164
To start off, 2000 Honda HR-V is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Volvo 164. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Volvo 164 would be higher. At 2,664 cc (6 cylinders), 1977 Volvo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Volvo 164 (138 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2000 Honda HR-V. (113 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1977 Volvo 164 should accelerate faster than 2000 Honda HR-V.
Because 1977 Volvo 164 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Volvo 164. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Honda HR-V, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1977 Volvo 164 (204 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Honda HR-V. (131 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1977 Volvo 164 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Honda HR-V.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Honda HR-V | 1977 Volvo 164 | |
Make | Honda | Volvo |
Model | HR-V | 164 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1672 cc | 2664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 113 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 131 Nm | 204 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4020 mm | 5610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 3350 mm |