2000 Honda J-VX vs. 1965 Mazda R 360
To start off, 2000 Honda J-VX is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 999 cc, 2000 Honda J-VX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Honda J-VX (104 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1965 Mazda R 360. (16 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Honda J-VX should accelerate faster than 1965 Mazda R 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Honda J-VX weights approximately 1081 kg more than 1965 Mazda R 360. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Mazda R 360 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Mazda R 360. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Honda J-VX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Honda J-VX (144 Nm) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Mazda R 360. (22 Nm). This means 2000 Honda J-VX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Mazda R 360.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Honda J-VX | 1965 Mazda R 360 | |
Make | Honda | Mazda |
Model | J-VX | R 360 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1965 |
Engine Size | 999 cc | 356 cc |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 16 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 22 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1465 kg | 384 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 1770 mm |