2000 Honda J-VX vs. 1972 Rover 3.5
To start off, 2000 Honda J-VX is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Rover 3.5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Rover 3.5 would be higher. At 3,532 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Rover 3.5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Rover 3.5 (150 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 2000 Honda J-VX. (104 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Rover 3.5 should accelerate faster than 2000 Honda J-VX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Rover 3.5 weights approximately 170 kg more than 2000 Honda J-VX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1972 Rover 3.5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Rover 3.5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Honda J-VX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Rover 3.5 (276 Nm) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Honda J-VX. (144 Nm). This means 1972 Rover 3.5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Honda J-VX.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Honda J-VX | 1972 Rover 3.5 | |
Make | Honda | Rover |
Model | J-VX | 3.5 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 999 cc | 3532 cc |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 276 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1465 kg | 1635 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2820 mm |