2000 Honda J-VX vs. 1979 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 2000 Honda J-VX is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1979 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Mazda RX-2 (118 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2000 Honda J-VX. (104 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1979 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 2000 Honda J-VX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Honda J-VX weights approximately 505 kg more than 1979 Mazda RX-2.
Because 1979 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Honda J-VX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Mazda RX-2 (158 Nm) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Honda J-VX. (144 Nm). This means 1979 Mazda RX-2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Honda J-VX.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Honda J-VX | 1979 Mazda RX-2 | |
Make | Honda | Mazda |
Model | J-VX | RX-2 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 999 cc | 2292 cc |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 158 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1465 kg | 960 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2480 mm |