2000 Honda J-VX vs. 1979 Volvo 265

To start off, 2000 Honda J-VX is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Volvo 265. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Volvo 265 would be higher. At 2,662 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Volvo 265 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Volvo 265 (148 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 2000 Honda J-VX. (104 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1979 Volvo 265 should accelerate faster than 2000 Honda J-VX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Honda J-VX weights approximately 65 kg more than 1979 Volvo 265.

Because 1979 Volvo 265 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Volvo 265. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Honda J-VX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Volvo 265 (218 Nm) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Honda J-VX. (144 Nm). This means 1979 Volvo 265 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Honda J-VX. 2000 Honda J-VX has automatic transmission and 1979 Volvo 265 has manual transmission. 1979 Volvo 265 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Honda J-VX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: