2000 Honda J-VX vs. 1995 Rover 200
To start off, 2000 Honda J-VX is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover 200 would be higher. At 1,994 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Rover 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Rover 200 (140 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2000 Honda J-VX. (104 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 2000 Honda J-VX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Honda J-VX weights approximately 259 kg more than 1995 Rover 200.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Rover 200 (185 Nm) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Honda J-VX. (144 Nm). This means 1995 Rover 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Honda J-VX. 2000 Honda J-VX has automatic transmission and 1995 Rover 200 has manual transmission. 1995 Rover 200 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Honda J-VX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Honda J-VX | 1995 Rover 200 | |
Make | Honda | Rover |
Model | J-VX | 200 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 999 cc | 1994 cc |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 185 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1465 kg | 1206 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2510 mm |