2000 Honda J-VX vs. 2009 Nissan NP300
To start off, 2009 Nissan NP300 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Honda J-VX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Honda J-VX would be higher. At 2,389 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Nissan NP300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan NP300 (141 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 2000 Honda J-VX. (104 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan NP300 should accelerate faster than 2000 Honda J-VX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Honda J-VX weights approximately 136 kg more than 2009 Nissan NP300.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan NP300 (205 Nm) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Honda J-VX. (144 Nm). This means 2009 Nissan NP300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Honda J-VX. 2000 Honda J-VX has automatic transmission and 2009 Nissan NP300 has manual transmission. 2009 Nissan NP300 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Honda J-VX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Honda J-VX | 2009 Nissan NP300 | |
Make | Honda | Nissan |
Model | J-VX | NP300 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 999 cc | 2389 cc |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 141 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 205 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1465 kg | 1329 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2960 mm |