2000 Honda J-VX vs. 2009 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2009 Volvo XC90 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Honda J-VX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Honda J-VX would be higher. At 3,192 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo XC90 (235 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 2000 Honda J-VX. (104 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 2000 Honda J-VX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 133 kg more than 2000 Honda J-VX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Honda J-VX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volvo XC90 (320 Nm) has 176 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Honda J-VX. (144 Nm). This means 2009 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Honda J-VX.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Honda J-VX | 2009 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Honda | Volvo |
Model | J-VX | XC90 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 999 cc | 3192 cc |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 235 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 320 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1465 kg | 1598 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2870 mm |