2000 Honda J-VX vs. 2012 Suzuki Equator
To start off, 2012 Suzuki Equator is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Honda J-VX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Honda J-VX would be higher. At 3,954 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Suzuki Equator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Suzuki Equator (262 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 2000 Honda J-VX. (104 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Suzuki Equator should accelerate faster than 2000 Honda J-VX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Honda J-VX weights approximately 400 kg more than 2012 Suzuki Equator.
Because 2012 Suzuki Equator is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Suzuki Equator. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Honda J-VX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Suzuki Equator (381 Nm) has 237 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Honda J-VX. (144 Nm). This means 2012 Suzuki Equator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Honda J-VX.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Honda J-VX | 2012 Suzuki Equator | |
Make | Honda | Suzuki |
Model | J-VX | Equator |
Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 999 cc | 3954 cc |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 262 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 381 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1465 kg | 1065 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 3560 mm |