2000 Honda J-VX vs. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Honda J-VX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Honda J-VX would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox (180 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 2000 Honda J-VX. (104 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 2000 Honda J-VX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 248 kg more than 2000 Honda J-VX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox (233 Nm) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Honda J-VX. (144 Nm). This means 2013 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Honda J-VX.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Honda J-VX | 2013 Chevrolet Equinox | |
| Make | Honda | Chevrolet |
| Model | J-VX | Equinox |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 999 cc | 2400 cc |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 180 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6700 RPM |
| Torque | 144 Nm | 233 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1465 kg | 1713 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2857 mm |
