2000 Honda Logo vs. 1942 Volvo PV 801-10
To start off, 2000 Honda Logo is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Volvo PV 801-10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Volvo PV 801-10 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1942 Volvo PV 801-10 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1942 Volvo PV 801-10 (85 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 2000 Honda Logo. (64 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1942 Volvo PV 801-10 should accelerate faster than 2000 Honda Logo.
Because 1942 Volvo PV 801-10 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Volvo PV 801-10. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Honda Logo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Honda Logo | 1942 Volvo PV 801-10 | |
| Make | Honda | Volvo |
| Model | Logo | PV 801-10 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1942 |
| Engine Size | 1343 cc | 3670 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 3260 mm |
