2000 Honda Logo vs. 1966 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2000 Honda Logo is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Triumph 2000 (91 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 2000 Honda Logo. (64 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 2000 Honda Logo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 230 kg more than 2000 Honda Logo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1966 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Honda Logo. (108 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1966 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Honda Logo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Honda Logo | 1966 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Honda | Triumph |
| Model | Logo | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1343 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 91 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 108 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2700 mm |
