2000 Honda Logo vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 2000 Honda Logo is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,343 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Honda Logo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Zastava 102 (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2000 Honda Logo. (64 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Zastava 102 should accelerate faster than 2000 Honda Logo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Honda Logo weights approximately 166 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Honda Logo | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Honda | Zastava |
| Model | Logo | 102 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1981 |
| Engine Size | 1343 cc | 1302 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 774 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2160 mm |
