2000 Hummer H1 vs. 1960 Mini MK I
To start off, 2000 Hummer H1 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Mini MK I would be higher. At 6,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Hummer H1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Hummer H1 (195 HP) has 161 more horse power than 1960 Mini MK I. (34 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Hummer H1 should accelerate faster than 1960 Mini MK I.
Because 2000 Hummer H1 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Mini MK I. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Hummer H1 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Hummer H1 (583 Nm) has 523 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Mini MK I. (60 Nm). This means 2000 Hummer H1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Mini MK I. 2000 Hummer H1 has automatic transmission and 1960 Mini MK I has manual transmission. 1960 Mini MK I will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Hummer H1 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Hummer H1 | 1960 Mini MK I | |
| Make | Hummer | Mini |
| Model | H1 | MK I |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6500 cc | 848 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 195 HP | 34 HP |
| Torque | 583 Nm | 60 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2200 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2040 mm |
