2000 Hummer H1 vs. 1976 Mazda RX-3
To start off, 2000 Hummer H1 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda RX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda RX-3 would be higher. At 6,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Hummer H1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Hummer H1 (195 HP) has 95 more horse power than 1976 Mazda RX-3. (100 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Hummer H1 should accelerate faster than 1976 Mazda RX-3.
Because 2000 Hummer H1 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Mazda RX-3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Hummer H1 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Hummer H1 (583 Nm) has 448 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mazda RX-3. (135 Nm). This means 2000 Hummer H1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mazda RX-3.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Hummer H1 | 1976 Mazda RX-3 | |
| Make | Hummer | Mazda |
| Model | H1 | RX-3 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1976 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6500 cc | 1964 cc |
| Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 195 HP | 100 HP |
| Torque | 583 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2200 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2320 mm |
