2000 Hummer H1 vs. 1996 Rover 220
To start off, 2000 Hummer H1 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Rover 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Rover 220 would be higher. At 6,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Hummer H1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Hummer H1 (195 HP) has 92 more horse power than 1996 Rover 220. (103 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Hummer H1 should accelerate faster than 1996 Rover 220.
Because 2000 Hummer H1 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Rover 220. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Hummer H1 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Hummer H1 (583 Nm) has 373 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Rover 220. (210 Nm). This means 2000 Hummer H1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Rover 220. 2000 Hummer H1 has automatic transmission and 1996 Rover 220 has manual transmission. 1996 Rover 220 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Hummer H1 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Hummer H1 | 1996 Rover 220 | |
Make | Hummer | Rover |
Model | H1 | 220 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6500 cc | 1993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 103 HP |
Torque | 583 Nm | 210 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2200 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2510 mm |