2000 Hummer H1 vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Hummer H1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Hummer H1 would be higher. At 6,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Hummer H1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (266 HP) has 71 more horse power than 2000 Hummer H1. (195 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2000 Hummer H1.
Because 2000 Hummer H1 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Hummer H1 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Hummer H1 (583 Nm) has 210 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Cadillac CTS. (373 Nm). This means 2000 Hummer H1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Cadillac CTS.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Hummer H1 | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Hummer | Cadillac |
| Model | H1 | CTS |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6500 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 195 HP | 266 HP |
| Torque | 583 Nm | 373 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4788 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2200 mm | 1882 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1422 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2880 mm |
