2000 Hummer H1 vs. 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Hummer H1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Hummer H1 would be higher. At 6,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Hummer H1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE (327 HP) has 132 more horse power than 2000 Hummer H1. (195 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE should accelerate faster than 2000 Hummer H1.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Hummer H1 (583 Nm) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE. (498 Nm). This means 2000 Hummer H1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Hummer H1 | 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE | |
| Make | Hummer | Cadillac |
| Model | H1 | ESCALADE |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6500 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 195 HP | 327 HP |
| Torque | 583 Nm | 498 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Electric |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 4-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 8 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 5144 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2200 mm | 2007 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1928 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2947 mm |
