2000 Hyundai Dynasty vs. 1956 Riley RM A
To start off, 2000 Hyundai Dynasty is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Hyundai Dynasty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Hyundai Dynasty weights approximately 445 kg more than 1956 Riley RM A.
Because 1956 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Hyundai Dynasty, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Hyundai Dynasty has automatic transmission and 1956 Riley RM A has manual transmission. 1956 Riley RM A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Hyundai Dynasty will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Hyundai Dynasty | 1956 Riley RM A | |
Make | Hyundai | Riley |
Model | Dynasty | RM A |
Year Released | 2000 | 1956 |
Engine Size | 2972 cc | 1495 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 202 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1680 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2870 mm |