2000 Hyundai Neos vs. 2008 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2008 Holden Commodore is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Hyundai Neos. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Hyundai Neos would be higher. At 2,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Hyundai Neos (247 HP) has 7 more horse power than 2008 Holden Commodore. (240 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Hyundai Neos should accelerate faster than 2008 Holden Commodore.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Hyundai Neos (260 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Holden Commodore. (240 Nm). This means 2000 Hyundai Neos will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Hyundai Neos | 2008 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Hyundai | Holden |
| Model | Neos | Commodore |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 2564 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 247 HP | 240 HP |
| Torque | 260 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.4 L/100km | 10.9 L/100km |
