2000 Isuzu Axiom vs. 1994 Mazda MX-3
To start off, 2000 Isuzu Axiom is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mazda MX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mazda MX-3 would be higher. At 3,493 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Isuzu Axiom is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Isuzu Axiom is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1994 Mazda MX-3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Isuzu Axiom will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Isuzu Axiom | 1994 Mazda MX-3 | |
Make | Isuzu | Mazda |
Model | Axiom | MX-3 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1994 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3493 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 212 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2460 mm |