2000 Isuzu VX-02 vs. 1992 Mazda MX-3
To start off, 2000 Isuzu VX-02 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mazda MX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mazda MX-3 would be higher. At 3,499 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Isuzu VX-02 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Isuzu VX-02 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Mazda MX-3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Isuzu VX-02 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Isuzu VX-02 | 1992 Mazda MX-3 | |
| Make | Isuzu | Mazda |
| Model | VX-02 | MX-3 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3499 cc | 1597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4230 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2460 mm |
