2000 Isuzu VX-02 vs. 1993 Mazda 626
To start off, 2000 Isuzu VX-02 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 3,499 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Isuzu VX-02 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Isuzu VX-02 (215 HP) has 101 more horse power than 1993 Mazda 626. (114 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Isuzu VX-02 should accelerate faster than 1993 Mazda 626.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Isuzu VX-02 (312 Nm) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Mazda 626. (170 Nm). This means 2000 Isuzu VX-02 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Mazda 626. 2000 Isuzu VX-02 has automatic transmission and 1993 Mazda 626 has manual transmission. 1993 Mazda 626 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Isuzu VX-02 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Isuzu VX-02 | 1993 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Isuzu | Mazda |
Model | VX-02 | 626 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1993 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3499 cc | 1989 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 114 HP |
Torque | 312 Nm | 170 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2630 mm |