2000 Isuzu VX-02 vs. 2004 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2004 Jaguar XK is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Isuzu VX-02. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Isuzu VX-02 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jaguar XK (294 HP) has 79 more horse power than 2000 Isuzu VX-02. (215 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2000 Isuzu VX-02. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jaguar XK weights approximately 11 kg more than 2000 Isuzu VX-02. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Isuzu VX-02 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Jaguar XK. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Isuzu VX-02 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jaguar XK (411 Nm) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Isuzu VX-02. (312 Nm). This means 2004 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Isuzu VX-02.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Isuzu VX-02 | 2004 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Isuzu | Jaguar |
Model | VX-02 | XK |
Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3499 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 294 HP |
Torque | 312 Nm | 411 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1794 kg | 1805 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2590 mm |