2000 Isuzu VX-02 vs. 2009 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Isuzu VX-02. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Isuzu VX-02 would be higher. At 3,727 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (268 HP) has 53 more horse power than 2000 Isuzu VX-02. (215 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 2000 Isuzu VX-02.
Because 2000 Isuzu VX-02 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Mazda CX-9. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Isuzu VX-02 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Isuzu VX-02 (312 Nm) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda CX-9. (269 Nm). This means 2000 Isuzu VX-02 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda CX-9.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Isuzu VX-02 | 2009 Mazda CX-9 | |
| Make | Isuzu | Mazda |
| Model | VX-02 | CX-9 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3499 cc | 3727 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 268 HP |
| Torque | 312 Nm | 269 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4600 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1940 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2340 mm |
