2000 Isuzu VX-02 vs. 2013 Volvo S80
To start off, 2013 Volvo S80 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Isuzu VX-02. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Isuzu VX-02 would be higher. At 3,499 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Isuzu VX-02 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo S80 (237 HP) has 22 more horse power than 2000 Isuzu VX-02. (215 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo S80 should accelerate faster than 2000 Isuzu VX-02. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Isuzu VX-02 weights approximately 94 kg more than 2013 Volvo S80.
Because 2000 Isuzu VX-02 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Volvo S80. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Isuzu VX-02 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Volvo S80 (320 Nm) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Isuzu VX-02. (312 Nm). This means 2013 Volvo S80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Isuzu VX-02.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Isuzu VX-02 | 2013 Volvo S80 | |
| Make | Isuzu | Volvo |
| Model | VX-02 | S80 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3499 cc | 3200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 237 HP |
| Torque | 312 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1794 kg | 1700 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4851 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1861 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1493 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2835 mm |
