2000 Jaguar F-Type vs. 1952 Talbot Baby
To start off, 2000 Jaguar F-Type is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 4,194 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar F-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar F-Type (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 282 more horse power than 1952 Talbot Baby. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar F-Type should accelerate faster than 1952 Talbot Baby. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jaguar F-Type weights approximately 150 kg more than 1952 Talbot Baby. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Jaguar F-Type | 1952 Talbot Baby | |
| Make | Jaguar | Talbot |
| Model | F-Type | Baby |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1952 |
| Engine Size | 4194 cc | 2690 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 390 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 5060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1100 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 3130 mm |
