2000 Jaguar F-Type vs. 1961 Volvo 120
To start off, 2000 Jaguar F-Type is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 4,194 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar F-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar F-Type (390 HP) has 331 more horse power than 1961 Volvo 120. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar F-Type should accelerate faster than 1961 Volvo 120. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jaguar F-Type weights approximately 805 kg more than 1961 Volvo 120. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Jaguar F-Type | 1961 Volvo 120 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Volvo |
| Model | F-Type | 120 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1961 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4194 cc | 1582 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 390 HP | 59 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 995 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1100 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2610 mm |
