2000 Jaguar F-Type vs. 1976 Volvo 265
To start off, 2000 Jaguar F-Type is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Volvo 265. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Volvo 265 would be higher. At 4,194 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar F-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar F-Type (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 242 more horse power than 1976 Volvo 265. (148 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar F-Type should accelerate faster than 1976 Volvo 265. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jaguar F-Type weights approximately 400 kg more than 1976 Volvo 265. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Jaguar F-Type | 1976 Volvo 265 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Volvo |
| Model | F-Type | 265 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4194 cc | 2664 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 390 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1400 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 4890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1100 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2660 mm |
