2000 Jaguar F-Type vs. 1983 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 2000 Jaguar F-Type is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 4,194 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar F-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar F-Type (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 276 more horse power than 1983 Lincoln Continental. (114 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar F-Type should accelerate faster than 1983 Lincoln Continental. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jaguar F-Type weights approximately 114 kg more than 1983 Lincoln Continental. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Jaguar F-Type | 1983 Lincoln Continental | |
Make | Jaguar | Lincoln |
Model | F-Type | Continental |
Year Released | 2000 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4194 cc | 2443 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 390 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1686 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 5120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1100 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2760 mm |