2000 Jaguar F-Type vs. 2005 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2005 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Jaguar F-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Jaguar F-Type would be higher. At 4,194 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar F-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar F-Type (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 162 more horse power than 2005 Mazda RX-8. (228 HP @ 8200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar F-Type should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda RX-8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jaguar F-Type weights approximately 735 kg more than 2005 Mazda RX-8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Jaguar F-Type has automatic transmission and 2005 Mazda RX-8 has manual transmission. 2005 Mazda RX-8 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Jaguar F-Type will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Jaguar F-Type | 2005 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
Model | F-Type | RX-8 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4194 cc | 1308 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 390 HP | 228 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 8200 RPM |
Top Speed | 251 km/hour | 235 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1065 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2840 mm |