2000 Jaguar F-Type vs. 2006 Chrysler Voyager
To start off, 2006 Chrysler Voyager is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Jaguar F-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Jaguar F-Type would be higher. At 4,194 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar F-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar F-Type (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 245 more horse power than 2006 Chrysler Voyager. (145 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar F-Type should accelerate faster than 2006 Chrysler Voyager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chrysler Voyager weights approximately 120 kg more than 2000 Jaguar F-Type.
Because 2000 Jaguar F-Type is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Jaguar F-Type. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chrysler Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Jaguar F-Type | 2006 Chrysler Voyager | |
| Make | Jaguar | Chrysler |
| Model | F-Type | Voyager |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4194 cc | 2429 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 390 HP | 145 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Top Speed | 251 km/hour | 183 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1920 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 2000 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1100 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2880 mm |
