2000 Jaguar F-Type vs. 2008 Jaguar X-Type
To start off, 2008 Jaguar X-Type is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Jaguar F-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Jaguar F-Type would be higher. At 4,194 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar F-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jaguar F-Type weights approximately 315 kg more than 2008 Jaguar X-Type.
Because 2000 Jaguar F-Type is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Jaguar F-Type. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jaguar X-Type, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Jaguar F-Type | 2008 Jaguar X-Type | |
| Make | Jaguar | Jaguar |
| Model | F-Type | X-Type |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4194 cc | 2099 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 390 HP | 0 HP |
| Top Speed | 251 km/hour | 205 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1485 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 4910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1100 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2720 mm |
