2000 Jaguar F-Type vs. 2008 Volvo S60
To start off, 2008 Volvo S60 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Jaguar F-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Jaguar F-Type would be higher. At 4,194 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar F-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar F-Type (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 285 more horse power than 2008 Volvo S60. (105 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar F-Type should accelerate faster than 2008 Volvo S60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jaguar F-Type weights approximately 360 kg more than 2008 Volvo S60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Jaguar F-Type is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Jaguar F-Type. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Volvo S60, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Jaguar F-Type | 2008 Volvo S60 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Volvo |
| Model | F-Type | S60 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4194 cc | 1983 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 390 HP | 105 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Top Speed | 251 km/hour | 215 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1100 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2720 mm |
