2000 Jaguar F-Type vs. 2009 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2009 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Jaguar F-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Jaguar F-Type would be higher. At 4,194 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar F-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar F-Type (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 188 more horse power than 2009 Jeep Wrangler. (202 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar F-Type should accelerate faster than 2009 Jeep Wrangler. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 243 kg more than 2000 Jaguar F-Type.
Because 2009 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Jaguar F-Type. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Jaguar F-Type has automatic transmission and 2009 Jeep Wrangler has manual transmission. 2009 Jeep Wrangler will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Jaguar F-Type will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Jaguar F-Type | 2009 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Jaguar | Jeep |
Model | F-Type | Wrangler |
Year Released | 2000 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4194 cc | 3778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 390 HP | 202 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 2043 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1100 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2950 mm |