2000 Jaguar F-Type vs. 2009 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2009 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Jaguar F-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Jaguar F-Type would be higher. At 4,194 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar F-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar F-Type (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 222 more horse power than 2009 Mitsubishi Outlander. (168 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar F-Type should accelerate faster than 2009 Mitsubishi Outlander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jaguar F-Type weights approximately 260 kg more than 2009 Mitsubishi Outlander. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Jaguar F-Type is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Jaguar F-Type. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mitsubishi Outlander, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Jaguar F-Type | 2009 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
| Make | Jaguar | Mitsubishi |
| Model | F-Type | Outlander |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4194 cc | 2360 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 390 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 4650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1100 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2680 mm |
