2000 Jaguar F-Type vs. 2011 Kia Cee'd
To start off, 2011 Kia Cee'd is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Jaguar F-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Jaguar F-Type would be higher. At 4,194 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar F-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar F-Type (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 276 more horse power than 2011 Kia Cee'd. (114 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar F-Type should accelerate faster than 2011 Kia Cee'd. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jaguar F-Type weights approximately 442 kg more than 2011 Kia Cee'd. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Jaguar F-Type is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Jaguar F-Type. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Kia Cee'd, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Jaguar F-Type | 2011 Kia Cee'd | |
Make | Jaguar | Kia |
Model | F-Type | Cee'd |
Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4194 cc | 1582 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 390 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Top Speed | 251 km/hour | 188 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1358 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1100 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2660 mm |